Degree of polarization of luminescence from GaAs and InP as a function of strain: a theoretical investigation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Experimentally, it is known that the degree of polarization (DOP) of luminescence is a sensitive function of strain in III–V materials. It has been assumed that DOP = − K e ( e 1 − e 2 ) and that the rotated degree of polarization = 2 K e e 6 , where K e is a positive calibration constant, e 1 and e 2 are the normal components of strain along perpendicular “1” and “2” directions, and e 6 = e 12 is the tensor shear strain. K e has been measured experimentally for GaAs and InP. In this paper, the results of a simple analytic determination of expressions for DOP as a function of strain are presented. Given the wide ranges reported for the strain deformation potentials b and d , it is not possible to give definitive and meaningful numerical values for expressions for DOP and K e . However, the sensitivity of DOP to strain suggests that it might be possible to design simple experiments to provide accurate values for the deformation potentials. The b and d deformation potentials might not be independent. For the results presented here and in the limit of isotropic material, an isotropic result for the DOP is found if d = 3 b .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".