MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3024459001 · doi:10.26355/eurrev_201907_18409

The value of toxicological and forensic analyses in the global challenge to health risks caused by new psychoactive substances.

2019· letter· en· W3024459001 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Simona Zaami, Francesco Paolo Busardò, Simona Pichini, Roberta Pacifici, Enrico Marinelli

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2019
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicForensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychoactive substanceValue (mathematics)Environmental healthForensic scienceMedicineToxicologyRisk analysis (engineering)BusinessPharmacologyPsychiatryBiologyMathematicsStatisticsVeterinary medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2018, the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) reported the appearance of new psychoactive substances (NPS) on European Union (EU) at a rate of about one per week for a total of 55 new drugs detected in 2018. On one hand, this figure is similar to that communicated in 2017 (N=51) and both of them are significantly lower if compared to those, above one hundred, appeared in 2014 and 2015. On the other hand, it has to be underlined that there has been a change in the type of substances coming into illegal market, since the most recent new psychoactive substances are increasingly more targeted in the long-term and to drug users with more addictive behavior. Specifically, new synthetic opioids and benzodiazepines are now the most reported substances by the EU Early Warning System, together with a distinct range of other recreational substances. The epidemics of both classes of substances come from United States and Canada, where both caused severe intoxications and fatalities purposely related to the use of synthetic opioids, particularly fentanyl derivatives. Although these two phenomena have not been so diffused in Europe, concerns do exist also in this area. About 50 new synthetic opioids, mainly fentanyl illicit analogs, have been reported up to now to the EU Early Warning System and the seizures of carfentanil, one of the most hazardous and potent opioids, have been particularly alarming. In this latter case and in that of many other fentanyl derivatives, due to the extreme potency of these compounds, they can be trafficked in very small quantities, which are difficult to detect. In addition, the synthetic opioids and new illegal benzodiazepine share the occurrence that they have been sold as fake kinds of commonly prescribed pain-relievers and antianxiety drugs. Regarding synthetic opioids, the fake OxyContin tablets containing metoxyacetylfentanyl, or fentanyl itself, have been reported by EU early warning system in the last two years. In case of new benzodiazepines, some of these are trafficked as fake types of Xanax, containing alprazolam or other compounds of the same class but illegally produced and sold, or even containing fentanyl and analogs. In this concern, the values of accurate and immediately available toxicological and forensic data are crucial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.235
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicForensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisFrench-language works237,207