MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3024505515 · doi:10.1109/tmech.2020.2993792

Vehicle Stability Control: Model Predictive Approach and Combined-Slip Effect

2020· article· en· W3024505515 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSlip (aerodynamics)Slip angleAxleControl theory (sociology)Model predictive controlSlip ratioAutomobile handlingController (irrigation)Structural engineeringAutomotive engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceControl (management)Aerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a model predictive vehicle stability controller that considers tire force nonlinearities and the combined-slip effect. Loss of cornering forces caused by increased longitudinal slip and changes in the slip angle due to the vehicle lateral response are considered in the prediction model of the controller. The developed controller adjusts tire slip ratios based on forces of the front and rear axles, monitors tire capacities, and normal forces, and exhibits excellent performance in maintaining lateral responses within a stable region. The performance of the proposed predictive controller is assessed in software simulations as well as road experiments in various pure-slip and combined-slip driving scenarios and under different road friction conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.786
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it