MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3024505515 · doi:10.1109/tmech.2020.2993792

Vehicle Stability Control: Model Predictive Approach and Combined-Slip Effect

2020· article· en· W3024505515 on OpenAlexafffund
Ehsan Hashemi, Milad Jalali, Amir Khajepour, Alireza Kasaiezadeh, Shih-Ken Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSlip (aerodynamics)Slip angleAxleControl theory (sociology)Model predictive controlSlip ratioAutomobile handlingController (irrigation)Structural engineeringAutomotive engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceControl (management)Aerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a model predictive vehicle stability controller that considers tire force nonlinearities and the combined-slip effect. Loss of cornering forces caused by increased longitudinal slip and changes in the slip angle due to the vehicle lateral response are considered in the prediction model of the controller. The developed controller adjusts tire slip ratios based on forces of the front and rear axles, monitors tire capacities, and normal forces, and exhibits excellent performance in maintaining lateral responses within a stable region. The performance of the proposed predictive controller is assessed in software simulations as well as road experiments in various pure-slip and combined-slip driving scenarios and under different road friction conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE/ASME Transactions on MechatronicsSame topicVehicle Dynamics and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207