MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3024568630 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-01482715mtgabs

Morphology, Composition and Sensor Performance of Nanoporous Au(Pt)

2020· article· en· W3024568630 on OpenAlexaff
Timothy Wong, Amirhossein Foroozan Ebrahimy, Brian Langelier, Ayman A. El‐Zoka

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNanoporous metals and alloys
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoble metalNanoporousMaterials scienceTernary operationCapacitive sensingAdsorptionPhase (matter)ScatteringAtom probeNanotechnologyMetalComposite materialMetallurgyAlloyChemistryComputer sciencePhysical chemistryOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent atom-probe tomography (APT) and ATEM studies of dealloyed layers in binary AgAu and ternary AgAuPt alloys showed the various ways in which more-noble elements enrich during dealloying, at the atomic scale (1). We have since extended this research in several directions – towards less expensive alloys, lean in more-noble elements, and towards the potential applications of such materials in gas sensing. In this presentation, we will start with a review of published and unpublished data from the APT study, which was done using alloys with 23 at% (Au + Pt). New information will then be shown for alloys with less than 6 at.% (Au + Pt). The dealloyed layers are very Ag-rich, and very interesting conflicts arise between enrichment of the more-noble element(s) on the ligament surfaces and the ultimate supply of those elements. For gas sensing applications, we take advantage of the effect of adsorption on ligament surfaces on electron scattering during conduction in the confined metal phase. Delicate impedance measurements at the milli-ohm level show that two kinds of environmental effect can be distinguished. Adsorption of water or other gases up to several molecular layers induce changes in the measured resistance of the metal phase, while thicker layers induce a double-layer charge separation leading to capacitive changes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicNanoporous metals and alloysFrench-language works237,207