MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3024595122 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-014563mtgabs

Toward High Areal Capacity Lithium Batteries Via 3D Printing: From Liquid to Solid

2020· article· en· W3024595122 on OpenAlexaff
Xuejie Gao, Xueliang Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCathodeMaterials scienceElectrodeEnergy storageFabricationLithium (medication)Nanotechnology3D printingElectrochemistryOptoelectronicsComposite materialElectrical engineeringPower (physics)ChemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3D-printing has found wide applications in numerous research fields, ranging from mechanical engineering, medicine, and material science to chemistry. Among them, it is capable of fabricating electrodes with high active material loading and improved ion/electron conductivity, and is thereby a promising method to improve the energy and power density of energy storage systems. And this technique offers a fresh viewpoint in designing high loading cathodes and will arise interest in other energy storage devices such as Li-ion batteries, Li-S batteries, and Li-Se batteries, etc. In this talk, I will talk about 3D-printed high active material loading cathode applied in batteries: from liquid to solid. In the first part of this talk, I will introduce 3D-printed high S loading cathode applied in liquid-based Li-S batteries. Compared with conventional cathode fabrication method, a 3D-printed S cathode with grid structure, which could facilitate Li+/e- transport at the macro, micro and nano scale in Li-S batteries. Moreover, a thickness-independent S cathode structure is also proposed via converting thick electrode into thousands of vertically aligned thin electrode by 3D printing. And each thin electrode delivers a constant thickness of around 20 μm, which is not affected by the intrinsic thickness of electrode as well as sulfur loading. Compared with other high S loading Li-S batteries performace, this work demonstrate a similar electrochemical kinetics in spite of the total sulfur loading or thickness of the electrode. [1-2] In the second part of this talk, I will talk about 3D-printed ultra-high Se loading cathode applied in solid-state Li-Se batteries. Compared with other Li-Se work, this work exhibits excellent cycling stability and remarkable rate performance with the highest reported Se loadings of 20 mg cm-2, and also delivers the highest reported areal capacity of 12.99 mA h cm-2 under a current density of 3 mA cm-2. The 3D-printed Se cathodes with grid structure provide large spaces for polymer electrolyte impregnation to further build interconnected Li+ transport channels in thick electrodes, enabling fast Li+ transport in solid-state Li-Se batteries. [3] References [1] X. Gao, X. Sun* et al, Nano Energy , 2019, 56, 595-603. [2] X. Gao, X. Sun* et al, Energy Storage Mater. Doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2019.08.001. [3] X. Gao, X. Sun* et al, J. Mater. Chem. A , under revision. Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207