MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3024661579 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-018751mtgabs

(Invited) Experimental Quantum Transport in Strain Engineered Graphene - Towards NOEMS

2020· article· en· W3024661579 on OpenAlexaff
A. R. Champagne

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGraphene and Nanomaterials Applications
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrapheneMaterials scienceBallistic conductionStrain engineeringConductanceScalar (mathematics)Bilayer grapheneOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyCondensed matter physicsPhysicsElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We measure ballistic charge conductivity in strained suspended graphene and observe the theoretically predicted [1] strain-induced scalar and vector potentials. To do so, we built an experimental platform for quantum transport strain engineering in 2D materials. This instrumentation permits low temperature (0.3 K- 70 K) transport in 0 to 9 Tesla magnetic fields. The tunable uniaxial strain (up to 3%) is completely decoupled from the gate-tunable charge density, permitting quantitative understanding of strain effects. We show slippage-free mechanical clamping of high aspect-ratio graphene crystals, where atomically ordered edges are unnecessary for quantitative straintronics. We study in detail transport in a ballistic graphene channel whose length is 90 nm and width is 600nm. By applying strain up to 0.6 % in this device, we observe that the strain-induced scalar potential shifts its low energy band structure downward by up to 30 meV. We show precise control of the gauge vector potential which reversibly suppresses the conductance by up to 14 %. We conclude with a brief overview of other projects aimed at integrating both RF dynamic strain control and optically resonant cavities in suspended bilayer graphene devices to achieve fully tunable nano-opto-electro-mechanical (NOEMS) carbon systems. We report for instance a nitrocellulose-based dry-stamping method to manipulate and suspend individual 2D materials. Using this method we assembled optical cavities able to a widely tune light absorption in graphene. [1] A. C. McRae, G. Wei, and A. R. Champagne, Phys. Rev. Applied 11, 054019 (2019) Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicGraphene and Nanomaterials ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207