MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3024676860 · doi:10.11575/prism/37829

Exploring Professional Identity Development in Medical Laboratory Professional Students

2020· dissertation· en· W3024676860 on OpenAlex
G. Hardy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Education and Curriculum Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentity (music)Professional developmentMedical educationPedagogyPsychologyMedicineArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite being the fourth largest health profession in Canada, medical laboratory science is perhaps one of the most poorly studied and underrepresented health care fields. While substantial research exists surrounding more well-known health care professions like nursing and medicine, there has been a minimal exploration of the sociological, cultural, and educational aspects of the medical laboratory profession in Canada. Given educational programs and clinical experiences are central to professional socialization processes and professional identity formation in health care professions, this research explores this process in a cohort of medical laboratory science students in the province of Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. Drawing from a conceptualization of professional identity development as a form of learning shaped through cognitive, emotional, and social dimensions of lived experience, I explored the individual and professional experiences of students in a contemporary medical laboratory training program. Utilizing a case study approach, the study focused on the experiences that occurred during students’ first substantive encounter with a clinical laboratory environment and evaluated how the clinical practicum served to affect their professional identity development, perspectives of the field, and view of the medical laboratory profession in a transformative way. Consistent with research in other health-related fields, findings indicated that clinical practicum serves as a particularly important transitional and transformational period for student medical laboratory professionals and is a time in which they reflect upon their attitudes, behaviours, roles, and experiences. This research concluded that exposure to the clinical realm serves to affect their sense of professional identity in meaningful ways.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.646
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it