MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3024772670 · doi:10.5539/jmr.v12n3p49

Mixed Finite Element-Characteristic Mixed Finite Element Method for Simulating Three-Dimensional Incompressible Miscible Displacement Problems

2020· article· en· W3024772670 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yirang Yuan, Tongjun Sun, Changfeng Li, Qing Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematics Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMathematicsFinite element methodMixed finite element methodMathematical analysisDiscretizationExtended finite element methodCompressibilityApplied mathematicsMechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A mixed finite element with the characteristics is presented as a local conservative numerical approximation for an incompressible miscible problem in porous media. A mixed finite element (MFE) is used for the pressure and Darcy velocity, and a characteristic method is for the saturation. The convection term is discretized along the characteristic direction and the diffusion term is discretized by zero-order mixed finite element method. The method of characteristics confirms the strong stability without numerical dispersion at sharp fronts. Moreover, large time step is possibly adopted without any accuracy loss. The scalar unknown function and the adjoint vector function are obtained simultaneously and the law of mass conservation holds in every element by the zero-order mixed finite element discretization of diffusion flux. In order to derive the optimal $3/2$-order error estimate in $L^2$ norm, a post-processing technique is included in the approximation to the scalar unknown saturation. This method can be used to solve the complicated problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.184
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematics ResearchSame topicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational MathematicsFrench-language works237,207