MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3024785563 · doi:10.24043/isj.109

The back side of the postcard: Subversion of the island tourist gaze in the contemporary Mallorcan imaginary

2020· article· en· W3024785563 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mercè Picornell

Bibliographic record

VenueIsland Studies Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIsland Studies and Pacific Affairs
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe ImaginarySubversionTourismGazeRhetoricTemporalityAgency (philosophy)Interpretation (philosophy)Space (punctuation)Perspective (graphical)CriticismSociologyDystopiaAestheticsComicsVisual artsArtHistoryLiteraturePsychologyPsychoanalysisEpistemologySocial sciencePhilosophyPolitical sciencePoliticsLawArchaeologyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article analyses the manner in which certain artists and activists in Mallorca have recently generated a counter-image of the traditional postcard, which essentially symbolises the tourist gaze. Taking examples from diverse sources, such as artistic pieces, memes, protest posters and underground comics, I analyse the mechanisms used to subvert the conventional tourist perspective of the island space. More specifically, I identify two strategies associated with the limitation of the space and time portrayed in the postcard. The confines of the space are manifest in the display of the off-camera and the critical anchorage of the image, while the limits of temporality are presented in a dystopic revision of the island map. To support the findings of this study, I have drawn on the ideas, theories and methods of island studies, tourism studies, postcolonial criticism and the rhetoric of images. The conclusions of this article aim to provide an interpretation of the complex emergence of a resistant social agency capable of creating its own portrayals of the island.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.754
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIsland Studies JournalSame topicIsland Studies and Pacific AffairsFrench-language works237,207