L’influence des revues spécialisées sur la pensée politique américaine à la fin de la guerre froide : la déconstruction de l’ennemi soviétique, 1987-1993*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les changements majeurs dans la politique étrangère soviétique à la fin des années 1980, l’ouverture du mur de Berlin et ultimement la dissolution de l’URSS forcent une réévaluation du statut d’adversaire qu’elle avait acquis aux États-Unis durant la guerre froide. Des débats se profilent en effet dans des revues publiées par des think tanks spécialisés en politique étrangère quant à la compréhension de ces événements et à la façon d’y réagir. On assiste alors à une déconstruction de l’image de l’ennemi et, malgré certaines propositions de collaboration, à une marginalisation de la nouvelle Russie dans l’analyse du jeu international. Ces discours allaient laisser leurs marques sur la façon de réfléchir la politique étrangère aux États-Unis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".