MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3024832755 · doi:10.1149/09707.0515ecst

Fabrication of Low-Cost Molds for Manufacturing of High Precise Micro Parts by Electroforming

2020· article· en· W3024832755 on OpenAlexaff
Sayed MohammadAli Aghili, Zhaohan Zheng, Rolf Wüthrich

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroformingFabricationMicrofabricationVolume (thermodynamics)3D printingProduction (economics)Manufacturing engineeringProduction costMaterials scienceRapid prototypingComputer scienceProcess engineeringNanotechnologyMechanical engineeringEngineeringMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, a broad range of microfabrication technologies have been developed for mass production. Manufacturing industry is however more and more facing the problem of producing personalized parts, resulting in low volume production. New technologies to allow economical fabrication of low volume micro-parts become a need. In this work, to address the issue of manufacturing high precise 3D micro-metallic parts for small series, 3D printing of micro-molds followed by electroforming to produce micro 3D metallic parts is proposed. This combination of processes can highly decrease fabrication costs for low volume production and allows to produce in parallel personalized parts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207