MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3024836184 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-01522851mtgabs

Neuronal Tau Protein Self-Assembly on Gold Surface: Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy and Cyclic Voltammetry Studies

2020· article· en· W3024836184 on OpenAlexaff
William Wallace, Sanela Martić

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDielectric spectroscopyCyclic voltammetryTau proteinChemistryElectrodeBiophysicsHeparinElectrochemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Alzheimer's diseaseBiochemistryChromatographyBiologyPathologyPhysical chemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tau is a neuronal protein responsible for microtubule formation [1]. It is also the pathological protein active in the Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) pathway. When Tau begins to aggregate as a result of misfolding, the neuronal cells die due to the lack of microtubule formation and can take on prion-like properties [2]. Therefore, detection of aggregated Tau can serve as a powerful tool in the early diagnosis of AD and dementia related diseases. As has been previously demonstrated, Tau 441 can be detected with an electrochemical immunoassay based on the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) by using gold electrode [3]. The EIS was also used to monitor interactions between Tau protein and Heparin [4]. Herein, we describe use of EIS and cyclic voltammetry (CV) to monitor and detect self-assembly of Tau protein on gold electrode. After modifying the surface of the electrode with Tau, the aggregation of Tau was performed using Heparin, as an aggregation inducer. The EIS and CV were measured as a function of Tau or Heparin concentrations, and incubation time and temperature. The control experiments included, Tau-free surface, Heparin-free solution, buffer solution in order to minimize aggregation. The charge transfer resistance, Rct, was determined by fitting the experimental data to the equivalent circuit. The Rct values for Tau-films on gold surface were compared prior and post aggregation. The Rct values were highly dependent on the experimental conditions used and that the electrochemical methods are promising sensing platforms for detection of neurodegenerative biomarkers which undergo self-assembly and aggregation. References [1] M.D. Weingarten, A.H. Lockwood, S. Hwo, M.W. Kirschner, A Protein Factor Essential for Microtubule Assembly, Natl. Acad Sci. 72 (1975) 1858–1862. [2] F. Clavaguera, J. Hench, M. Goedert, M. Tolnay, Prion-like transmission and spreading of tau pathology, Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 41 (2015) 47–58. [3] N. Carlin, S. Martic-Milne, Anti-tau antibodies based electrochemical sensor for detection of tau protein biomarkers, J. Electrochem. Soc. 165 (2018) G3018–G3025. [4] H. Trzeciakiewicz, J. Esteves-Villanueva, R. Soudy, K. Kaur, S. Martic-Milne, Electrochemical characterization of protein adsorption onto YNGRT-Au and VLGXE-Au surfaces, Sensors (Switzerland). 15 (2015) 19429–19442.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting Abstracts→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→