The Effects of Geometry on the P-Wave Seismic Response of Massive Mineral Deposits
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Results from analogue seismic modelling aimed to investigate the effect that the geometry of a mineral deposit imposes on its seismic response are presented. 3D Seismic data were acquired on two physical models representing the possible end-member geometries of mineral deposits. The physical modelling involved acquisition of 3D pre-stack data on scale models. The results for the ellipsoidal model comprised closed, continuous, circular diffraction patterns in time slices. For the cylindrical model, the quality of the stack was degraded by the scattering caused by the rugged surface. The diffraction patterns were discontinuous and comprised the diagnostic concentric, circular amplitude peaks and troughs which would allow identification of drill targets in field data. The results show that 3D seismic data are valuable in mineral exploration because they provide (1) enhanced spatial resolution, and (2) slices of time help to identify the seismic response of small seismic targets with complex geometry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it