MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3024884386 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-0114966mtgabs

Relationship between Metallurgical States and Corrosion Resistance of Nitrided Martensitic Steels in Marine Environment

2020· article· en· W3024884386 on OpenAlexaff
J. Creus, P. Roux de Reilhac, Grégory Michel, V. Branger, Simon Frappart, Denis Fleche, Dao Trinh, X. Feaugas

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal and Thin Film Mechanics
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNitridingMaterials scienceMetallurgyCorrosionNitrideMartensiteLayer (electronics)MicrostructureComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective is focused on the comprehension of the relationship between the metallurgical state and the functional properties of nitrided martensitic stainless steels. Nitriding is performed by a low temperature plasma treatment (Direct Current mode) in various conditions. Metallurgy of the nitrided layer was characterized at different scales, from the macroscopic to the nanometric ones. An increase of the thickness of the nitrided layer with temperature of the plasma treatment is observed. Precipitation of CrN and others nitrided phases in relation with crystallographic defects is observed. Moreover, the TEM analyses on FIB samples extracted from the surface highlight the formation of a succession of different nitrided layers depending on the nitrogen content : expanded martensite, iron-nitride phases [2]. The electrochemical properties of nitrided samples are also assessed by voltammetry test and extended immersion test. Results highlight differences on the corrosion behaviour of the nitrided X17CrNi16-2 steels with temperature of the plasma treatment. The reactivity evolution is linked to the formation of a “composite” system composed of different layers. SECM was used to understand the reactivity evolution through these layers, and successive surface grinding permits to corroborate the reactivity evolution and to understand the origin of the corrosion resistance evolution after nitriding process. [1] H.E. Boyer, T.L. Gall. Metal Handbook , Desk edition, ASM, Ohio, USA, 1986 [2] J. Yang &al. Materials and Design, Vol. 32 (2011) 808-814

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.547
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicMetal and Thin Film MechanicsFrench-language works237,207