MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3024910983 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-012193mtgabs

Corelative Imaging of Battery Heterogeneities: Ionic Transport, Electronic Structure and Chemistry

2020· article· en· W3024910983 on OpenAlexaff
Jigang Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsXANESBattery (electricity)Characterization (materials science)NanotechnologyIonic bondingElectrodeElectronic structureMaterials scienceChemistrySpectroscopyIonPhysicsPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deeper understanding of the heterogeneities, an intrinsic characteristic in batteries, including ionic transport, and chemical and electronic structures at interface and bulk of active materials and its dependence on other components in a battery is crucial for developing better performance batteries, especially for electric transportation purposes. Element specific X-ray absorption near-edge structures (XANES) spectroscopy, explores detailed information on the local chemistry and electronic states of the absorbing atom which makes it an excellent tool to understand chemical bonding, electronic structure, and surface and bulk chemistry difference in batteries. XANES with nano-focused X-ray beam (STXM) and surface sensitive field-imaging X-PEEM can collect chemical imaging of high chemical sensitivity with good spatial resolutions. In this talk I will show nanoscale chemical imaging studies of battery materials by STXM and X-PEEM at CLS. The emphasis is imaging inhomogeneity under “normal” or abusive conditions in a commercial like electrode with preserved interface structure. The studies show that the battery heterogeneity is an interplay of local environment, morphology and facet orientation of electrode active materials. Such novel characterization tools shall lead new insights on battery engineering toward a better battery with high performance, long service life and high safety.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.803

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207