Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[1] This paper presents the lateral variations of the vertically averaged magnetization model of the Martian crust determined from the degree 50 spherical harmonic model of the magnetic potential. The model potential is derived using the Mars Global Surveyor low-altitude magnetic data acquired within elevations of 85–200 km. The potential model is first verified by comparing the three orthogonal components of the corresponding vector field with the observed high-altitude (∼380 km) data. Using the paleopole positions calculated through modeling 10 isolated, small magnetic anomalies, the model potential is inverted to determine the vertically averaged magnetization of a nominal 50 km thick crust. The crust is highly magnetic, with a magnetization contrast (peak-to-trough) as high as 35 A/m. The lack of distinct magnetic signatures for the giant impact basins, Hellas, Argyre and Isidis, and the absence of a magnetic anomaly associated with the north-south topographic dichotomy indicate that the upper parts of the crust are low magnetic and that the strong magnetic source bodies are in the lower parts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it