MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025028606 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-016661mtgabs

Dyes Encapsulated By Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes: A Raman Nanoprobe of Cancer Detection

2020· article· en· W3025028606 on OpenAlexaff
Suraj Mal, Nathalie Tang, Carolane David, Charlotte Allard, Layane Duarte, Louis Gaboury, Sara Ouellette, Richard Martel

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Research in Immunology and CancerPhoton Etc (Canada)Polytechnique MontréalUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanoprobeRaman spectroscopyCovalent bondNanotechnologyCarbon nanotubeCancer cellMaterials sciencePEGylationChemistryNanoparticleCancerPolyethylene glycolBiochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carbon nanotubes are among the most promising platforms for biological applications such as cancer targeting, medical imaging and drug delivery. Herein we present a novel approach to modify single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) into Raman nanoprobes capable of targeting biomarkers on cancer cells. The process involves cleaning and shortening in acids followed by encapsulation of specific organic dyes. Subsequently the as-synthesized Raman nanoprobes are then covalently attached with modified NH 2 -PEG-COOH to make a generic nanoprobe that is bio-compatible and highly dispersed in aqueous or buffer media. When covalently linked to specific antibodies anti-E-cadherin (monoclonal mouse anti-human) and CK19 (cytokeratin), such nanoprobes can be used to detect there bio-markers in the membrane of breast cancer cell lines. Here, we will first discuss a modified synthetic approach to densify the covalent pegylation used to link bio-molecules on the SWCNTs and show results with nanoprobes incubated with T47D antibody (ab) and MDA231 cell lines. The immunofluorescence and Raman imaging data shows that dyes@SWCNT/PEG/ab composites can specifically target cancer cells overexpressing high affinity receptors of the specific biomarkers linked to the probes. By densifying the covalently attached PEGs, the results show higher stability and improved selectivity of the Raman nanoprobes towards bio-molecules on cancer cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.710

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207