A path integral ground state replica trick approach for the computation of entanglement entropy of dipolar linear rotors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We calculate the second Rényi entanglement entropy for systems of interacting linear rotors in their ground state as a measure of entanglement for continuous rotational degrees of freedom. The entropy is defined in relation to the purity of a subsystem in a bipartite quantum system, and to compute it, we compare two sampling ensembles based on the path integral ground state (PIGS) formalism. This scheme centers on the replica trick and is aided by the ratio trick, both developed in this context by Hastings et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 157201 (2010)]. We study a system composed of linear quantum rotors on a lattice in one dimension, interacting via an anisotropic dipole-dipole potential. The ground state second Rényi entropies estimated by PIGS are benchmarked against those from the density matrix renormalization group for various interaction strengths and system sizes. We find that the entropy grows with an increase in interaction strength, and for large enough systems, it appears to plateau near log(2). We posit that the limiting case of many strongly interacting rotors behaves akin to a lattice of two-level particles in a cat state, in which one naturally finds an entanglement entropy of log(2).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".