MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025066709 · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(20)30249-7

An appeal for practical social justice in the COVID-19 global response in low-income and middle-income countries

2020· article· en· W3025066709 on OpenAlexaffabout
Maureen Kelley, Rashida A. Ferrand, Kui Muraya, Simukai Chigudu, Sassy Molyneux, Madhukar Pai, Edwine Barasa

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Global Health · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersEconomic and Social Research CouncilAfrican Academy of SciencesNew Partnership for Africa's DevelopmentMedical Research CouncilGovernment of the United KingdomWellcome Trust
KeywordsPandemicSocioeconomic statusPublic healthCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Political scienceEconomic growthDevelopment economicsEnvironmental healthMedicineEconomicsDiseaseInfectious disease (medical specialty)Population

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic hit the world's wealthiest countries first, shaping global public health responses and messaging. As the pandemic escalates in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), there is a growing call to identify locally tailored solutions.1,2 Because outbreaks are not only public health emergencies, but also political and socioeconomic emergencies, we can learn from African Ebola and cholera responses and avoid “biomedical tunnel vision”3 by actively addressing wider socioeconomic and health inequities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.032
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.046
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.170

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0320.046
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0190.059
Scholarly communication0.0280.033
Open science0.0020.029
Research integrity0.0240.027
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.490
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations93
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Global HealthSame topicViral Infections and Outbreaks ResearchFrench-language works237,207