MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025066772 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-015617mtgabs

Synthesis and Electrochemical Study of Graphene-Based Nanocomposites for Hydrogen Sorption and Storage

2020· article· en· W3025066772 on OpenAlexaff
Emmanuel Boateng, Antony R. Thiruppathi, Aicheng Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicHybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrogen storageGrapheneMaterials scienceNanomaterialsOxidePhysisorptionNanotechnologyHydrogenChemical engineeringChemistryAdsorptionComposite materialOrganic chemistryMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With impending serious concerns associated with climate change and the depletion of fossil fuels, an envisaged hydrogen economy remains a viable alternative for addressing future energy issues. However, the significant technical challenges from vehicular hydrogen storage systems such as weight, efficiency, safety and cost constraints must be properly resolved before a commercial application is possible. Compared to compressed high-pressure and liquid hydrogen storage systems, storing hydrogen in solid systems via chemisorption and physisorption is emerging as a promising approach for hydrogen storage [1-3]. In this presentation, recent advances in the solid-state hydrogen storage with a high volumetric density are highlighted. In addition, graphene-based nanomaterials have been considered as a promising candidate for hydrogen storage due to its lightweight and high surface area [4]. We have synthesized graphene oxide (GO), reduced graphene oxide (rGO) and boron-doped reduced graphene oxide (B-rGO) and investigated their performance for hydrogen storage. To enhance their capacity for hydrogen storage, the fabricated graphene oxide based nanomaterials were further modified with palladium (Pd) nanoparticles. The morphological features, structure and chemical compositions of the synthesized nanomaterials (GO, rGO and B-rGO) and nanocomposites (Pd/GO, Pd/rGO and Pd/B-rGO) were characterized using field-emission scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy, showing that Pd nanoparticles were uniformly dispersed on the B-rGO surface. Cyclic voltammetry and galvanostatic charging-discharging technique were employed to probe the hydrogen storage capacity of the graphene based nanomaterials and the nanocomposites. The effect of the boron substitution and the Pd nanoparticle decoration on the hydrogen storage are discussed. References: [1] A. Chen, C. Ostrom. Palladium-based nanomaterials: synthesis and electrochemical applications. Chem. Rev. 115 (2015) 11999 - 12044. [2] S. Konda, A. Chen, Palladium based nanomaterials for enhanced hydrogen spillover and storage. Mater. Today 19 (2016) 100 - 108. [3] E. Boateng, A. Chen, Recent advances in nanomaterials-based solid-state hydrogen storage. Mater. Today Adv. (2019) in press. [4] S. K. Konda, A. Chen, One-step synthesis of Pd and reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites for enhanced hydrogen sorption and storage. Electrochem. Commun. 60 (2015) 148–152.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicHybrid Renewable Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207