MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025067301 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2019-0138

Mechanical, electrical, linear, and nonlinear optical behavior of gamma-irradiated thiourea-doped lithium sulfate single crystals

2020· article· en· W3025067301 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. S. Dileep, M. Suresh Kumar, Sindhu Tilak

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSolid-state spectroscopy and crystallography
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonoclinic crystal systemDielectricCrystalliteBand gapAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Crystal (programming language)TransmittanceIrradiationSingle crystalMaterials scienceDopingTetragonal crystal systemThioureaSecond-harmonic generationOpticsCrystallographyOptoelectronicsCrystal structurePhysicsLaserChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A thiourea-doped lithium sulfate single crystal was grown by the solution growth slow evaporation technique. The unit cell parameters of the grown crystal determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies indicated that the crystal belongs to a monoclinic crystal system with noncentrosymmetric space group P2. Ultraviolet–visible spectral study signified that the crystal possesses an energy gap of 4.54 eV with 68% transparency in the visible region. The grown crystals were irradiated by Co-60 gamma radiation with different doses of 10 kGy, 30 kGy, and 50 kGy and the effects on powder XRD, dielectric properties, mechanical hardness, linear transmittance, and second harmonic generation (SHG) of the crystal were studied. It is observed that the crystallite size, energy gap, and transparency decreased, whereas the dielectric constant, AC conductivity, microhardness, and SHG efficiency increased with an increase in radiation dose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.798

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicSolid-state spectroscopy and crystallographyFrench-language works237,207