Rousseau entre patriotisme républicain et cosmopolitisme. Rousseau, la République, la paix. Actes du colloque du GIPRI (Grand-Saconnex, 2012), sous la direction de Gabriel Galice et de Christophe Miqueu, Paris, Honoré Champion éditeur, coll. « Les dix-huitièmes siècles », 2017.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gabriel Galice et Christophe Miqueu ont coordonné un ouvrage collectif qui s’interroge sur l’actualité de Rousseau pour la pensée politique et internationale. Réunissant des universitaires de tous horizons (philosophie, histoire, science politique, littérature) et des responsables politiques, ce livre examine les problèmes actuels de la démocratie à la lumière des textes de l’illustre citoyen de Genève. La thèse défendue est que le patriotisme républicain constitue la condition d’une paix durable à l’échelle mondiale, voire d’un projet cosmopolitique fondé sur une coopération renforcée des États-nations. Rousseau constitue à ce titre un interlocuteur critique de Kant et de son projet de paix perpétuelle.Gabriel Galice and Christophe Miqueu coordinate a collective work questioning Rousseau’s contemporary relevance for political and international thought. Gathering both politicians and scholars from different fields (philosophy, history, political science, literature), this book examines current issues relating to democracy, in the light of a number of texts by this celebrated citizen of Geneva. The authors develop the idea that republican patriotism is the condition for a global and lasting peace, and perhaps for a cosmopolitan project based on enhanced cooperation between nation states. Therefore, Rousseau represents a critical interlocutor of Kant and his project of perpetual peace.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".