MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025078692 · doi:10.1088/1361-6544/ac20a4

Effective bounds for monochromatic connectivity measures in two dimensions

2021· preprint· en· W3025078692 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueNonlinearity · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometry and complex manifolds
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMeasure (data warehouse)Monochromatic colorMathematicsFunction (biology)Zero (linguistics)Set (abstract data type)Probabilistic logicPlane (geometry)Discrete mathematicsPhysicsComputer scienceGeometryStatisticsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We establish numerical lower bounds for the monochromatic connectivity measure in two dimensions introduced by Sarnak and Wigman. This measure dictates among the nodal domains of a random plane wave what proportion have any given number of holes, and how they are nested. Our bounds provide the first effective estimate for the number of simply connected domains and for those that contain a single hole. The deterministic aspect of the proof is to find a single function with a prescribed zero set and, using a quantitative form of the implicit function theorem, to argue that the same configuration occurs in the zero set of any sufficiently close approximation to this function. The probabilistic aspect is to quantify the likelihood of a random wave being close enough to this function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.483
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it