MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025124846 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2020.2994751

Inter Harmonic THD Amplification of Voltage Source Converter: Concept and Case Study

2020· article· en· W3025124846 on OpenAlex
Chuanchuan Hou, Miao Zhu, Zhengzhao Li, Yunwei Li, Xu Cai

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of China
KeywordsTotal harmonic distortionTHD analyzerElectrical engineeringHarmonicVoltageVoltage sourceHarmonic analysisElectronic engineeringComputer sciencePhysicsEngineeringAcousticsNonlinear distortionAmplifier

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter, with the consideration of both PLL and the inter-harmonic voltage perturbation, a technical concept of “inter-harmonic total harmonic distortion (THD) amplification” has been presented, by which a hidden output feature of voltage source converter (VSC) has been unveiled. The phenomenon has been explained in theory that the THD of current is greater than the THD of voltage under the inter-harmonic perturbation during the particular frequency range. The detailed frequency range and boundary characteristics have been given for reference. Both the theoretical analysis and experimental results based on RT-LAB validate the proposed inter-harmonic THD amplification phenomenon. This letter could deepen the understanding of the fundamental THD theory, and provide a new way to evaluate the grid integration performance of VSCs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score0.897

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it