Preschoolers’ and Adults’ Recognition of the Impact of Activities on Weight
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two studies examined if preschoolers and adults recognized the impact of physical and sedentary activities on height and weight. Study 1 investigated if participants associated physically active activities with being thin and sedentary activities with being heavy. Study 2 examined if preschoolers could benefit from being taught the role of activities on height and weight. The results from Study 1 demonstrated that adults associated being heavy to engaging in physically sedentary activities but in Study 2, they associated being thin to engaging in physically active activities. However, preschoolers across both studies did not recognize the role that activities played on weight. Teaching preschoolers about the impact of activities did not have a significant effect on their performance. The results from these studies also indicate that adults erroneously reason about the impact of activities based on whether they view the type of activity as being positive or negative. Preschoolers’ lack of knowledge in this area could be due to the lack of consistent environmental input or that they are not conceptually ready to learn about this topic. These findings highlight the urgent need for parents and educators to emphasize the importance of physical activities in maintaining a healthy lifestyle in early childhood.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".