Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we first proposed the Quasi-Bielliptic Problem (QBEP) in the Sun-Earth-Moon three-body problem. In this model, we assume that the Moon revolves around the Earth in a quasi-elliptic orbit perturbed by the solar gravity, whereas the orbit of the Earth-Moon barycenter around the Sun has been known to be strictly elliptic. In addition, we assumed that these three celestial bodies move in the same orbital plane. The differential equations for the first-order analytical expansion of the lunar quasi-elliptic orbit were derived. Using a computational approach, these differential equations were transformed into a system of linear equations and then solved numerically. The validity of our semianalytical result was testified by comparing with the results of numerical integration. The differences between analytical results of the QBEP and the QBEP have been discussed in detail. The influences of these two eccentricities on analytical results were also investigated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it