MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025220386 · doi:10.3917/i2d.201.0039

Le Service d’aide à la rédaction d’articles (SARA)

2020· article· fr· W3025220386 on OpenAlex
Prasun Lala, Félix Langevin-Harnois

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueI2D - Information données & documents · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Savoir rédiger et publier un article, préparer une conférence, présenter ses travaux… : ces compétences sont devenues essentielles pour les métiers scientifiques. Or les étudiants des cycles supérieurs éprouvent des difficultés à bien communiquer et se sentent souvent isolés. Pour les aider, quatre professeurs de l’École de technologie supérieure de Montréal, ont lancé en 2013 un Service d’aide à la rédaction d’articles (SARA). Dans cette communauté d’apprentissage, aujourd’hui prise en charge par la Bibliothèque, étudiants, chercheurs et experts, s’entraident, en partageant ressources, activités et expériences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.849
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0050.045
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.177
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.107 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it