MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Incidencia de la gastronomía para elegir un destino. Caso de estudio: Baños de Agua Santa. Tungurahua-Ecuador

2020· article· es· W3025252786 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueConcienciaDigital · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBusiness, Innovation, and Economy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El punto de partida para este trabajo sobre la naturaleza de la demanda del producto de gastronomía turística es la motivación que los turistas tienen para los destinos y experimentar su gastronomía. Con base a este argumento se realiza la investigación en la Ciudad de Baños de Agua Santa, cantón de la Provincia de Tungurahua considerado como uno de los destinos turísticos más visitados en el Ecuador. La investigación se realiza considerando una muestra de turistas a los que se les aplica una encuesta para determinar las motivaciones de su viaje. De igual manera se procede con los restaurantes legalmente registrados a los que se les aplica un instrumento similar con el propósito de conocer la oferta gastronómica. Los resultados obtenidos indican los aspectos relevantes de la situación de la gastronomía en la ciudad de Baños de Agua Santa estableciéndose que es un elemento importante en el entorno y desarrollo de las actividades turísticas como soporte de la operación, presenta una diversidad de comidas nacionales e internacionales buscando satisfacer los requerimientos de los visitantes. Al comparar los resultados obtenidos y realizar un análisis de contraste entre el tipo de turistas y el tipo de gastronomía se establece que, sin embargo de ser la gastronomía un elemento importante que da sostenimiento a la actividad turística de la ciudad, no es un factor determinante como para que los turistas elijan el destino por esta razón. Sin embargo se concluye que la gastronomía manejada de forma adecuada, manteniendo los niveles de calidad de la oferta de platos y la calidad de servicio se constituye en un elemento promocional importante que por sus características de experiencia sensorial es capaz de potenciar el destino.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationallow
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it