MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025274793 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-01171121mtgabs

Preparation of Plasmonic Cu Nanoparticles By Pulsed Laser Ablation in Liquid and Their Characterization

2020· article· en· W3025274793 on OpenAlexaff
Yong Wang, Dongling Ma, Mohamed Chaker

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceLaser ablation synthesis in solutionNanoparticlePlasmonSurface plasmon resonanceLaser ablationPhotocatalysisVisible spectrumAbsorption (acoustics)NanotechnologyLaserPlasmonic nanoparticlesOptoelectronicsFluenceOpticsLaser power scalingChemistryX-ray laserComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photocatalysis plays a pivotal role in solar energy transferring into usable energy. In recent years, visible light driven photocatalysts have been attracted more attention due to the broadened solar absorption wavelength. In this regard, the plasmonic photocatalysts based on gold (Au), silver (Ag) and copper (Cu) can strongly absorb visible light due to their localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR). Compared with most studied Ag and Au nanoparticles, Cu is a low-cost plasmonic material owing to its higher earth abundance. However, the difficulty in fabricating chemically stable Cu nanoparticles limits their application. Here, the colloidal Cu nanoparticles were fabricated via pulsed laser ablation in liquid (PLAL) by Nd:YAG laser (1064 nm) and the size and optical properties of the nanoparticles were characterized by transmission electron microscopy and UV-visible spectrophotometry, respectively. The effect of fabrication parameters, such as laser fluence, ablation time, organic solvent and ablation time was further investigated. In addition, the composition and stability of the as-prepared plasmonic Cu nanoparticle was also studied. The as-prepared plasmonic Cu nanoparticle exhibit strong LSPR absorption peak in the visible region, which is beneficial to the application in photocatalysis, solar energy harvesting, optoelectronics, and biomedical technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.529

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicLaser-Ablation Synthesis of NanoparticlesFrench-language works237,207