Cutting performances of TiCN–HfC and TiCN–HfC–WC ceramic tools in dry turning hardened AISI H13
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cutting performances of TiCN–HfC (TH) and TiCN–HfC–WC (THW) ceramic tools in dry turning hardened AISI H13 was investigated. The optimal cutting parameters – cutting speed of 110 m/min, feed rate of 0.1 mm/rev and depth of cut of 0.15 mm – were obtained by the orthogonal experiment. At the optimal cutting parameters, the tool life of TH was 82 min higher than that of THW, which indicated that TH had better wear resistance than THW. Meanwhile, the workpiece had better surface quality after turned by TH than by THW. In addition, a crescent depression formed in the rake face and a jackboot-like shape appeared in the flank. The rake face took place crater wear, while the flank took place abrasive wear, oxidation wear and adhesive wear.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it