MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025500926 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-01381666mtgabs

Controlling Electrochemical Reactivity of Mesoporous Carbons By Surface Modification

2020· article· en· W3025500926 on OpenAlexaff
Viola Birss, Samantha Luong, Marwa Atwa, Xiaoan Li, Xia Tong, Erwan Bertin, Ruohong Sui, Robert A. Marriott

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier UniversityUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroporous materialMaterials scienceMesoporous materialSurface modificationChemical engineeringCarbon fibersGrapheneNanomaterialsElectrochemistryNanotechnologyWettingNanoparticleElectrolyteReactivity (psychology)Specific surface areaCatalysisOrganic chemistryChemistryElectrodeComposite materialComposite number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carbon nanomaterials are used in a wide array of electrochemical applications, such as in fuel cells, batteries, capacitors, and sensors. These materials typically have the high surface area and conductivity required for good electrochemical performance and are low in cost. Many different types of carbon nanomaterials are studied, including microporous Vulcan carbon and Ketjenblack, carbon nanotubes, templated carbons, graphene and its derivatives. While microporous carbons are often used as cathode supports in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), most carbons are susceptible to corrosion, with pores too small to fit catalytic Pt nanoparticles or contain Nafion ionomer, and have varying and uncontrolled pathways between carbon particles, yielding transport limitations that influence electrochemical performance. Thus, interest is increasingly being focused on mesoporous carbons as catalyst support materials. Colloid imprinted carbons (CICs) are one example of promising mesoporous carbon materials and are the focus of this presentation. CICs are prepared from abundant and inexpensive precursors that are templated with silica colloids of a precise size to achieve ordered mesoporosity. Previously, CIC powders with pore sizes of 12, 22, and 50 nm (with still smaller internal necks) were studied, focusing on their corrosion resistance and wettability before and after functionalization with a hydrophobic surface group (-PhF 5 ), achieved through diazonium chemistry. 1–3 In the present work, we investigated CICs with larger pore sizes in the range of 85 nm to better simulate the typical size of the pathways and pores present in common, ink-derived microporous carbons, attaching both –PhF 5 and a hydrophilic surface functional group, -PhSO 3 H, to the CIC-85 surface. The larger CIC pore size should be beneficial for use in PEMFC cathode supports, as they can accommodate both Pt nanoparticles and ionomer without hindering mass transport. The CIC-85 material was prepared by mixing a suspension of 85 nm silica particles and ground mesophase pitch precursor in ethanol and then imprinting at 400 °C for 2 hrs under nitrogen before being carbonized at 900 °C for 2 hrs in nitrogen. The silica was removed by 24 hr NaOH reflux, then washed with water until neutralized. Surface functionalization was achieved by refluxing the CIC-85 powder for 24 hr under nitrogen with amyl nitrate and either 2,3,4,5,6-pentafluoroaniline in acetonitrile, or sulfanilic acid in water, to form hydrophobic or hydrophilic CIC-85 surface properties, respectively. The product was then treated to a 24 hr acetonitrile Soxhlet extraction and air-dried. Characterization techniques, including Raman spectroscopy, XRD, SEM, and gas sorption (BET analysis), showed that the ordered porosity of the CIC-85 was fully preserved after functionalization and that average pore sizes decreased by a few nm, consistent with the presence of surface functional groups. Neutron activation analysis and CHNS elemental analysis confirmed the successful functionalization of the CIC-85 powder with hydrophobic -PhF 5 and hydrophilic -PhSO 3 H groups, respectively. The electrochemistry of the CICs, before and after surface functionalization, were studied by using a CIC-85, 12% sulfuric acid, and 1 wt% Nafion in ethanol ink mixture, with 0.2 mg of the CIC-85 loaded onto a glassy carbon rod electrode. The CIC material was tested in 0.5 M sulfuric acid for its CV response in the normal potential range for carbon and also exposed to an electrochemical accelerated stress test (AST) protocol, designed to reduce testing time and to account for real time surface area changes as a result of surface roughening and mass loss. The AST involved holding at 1.0 V vs RHE for 10 s and then stepping to and holding at 1.4 V for 50 s, repeatedly, and then reporting the difference in the cumulative oxidation vs reduction charges, equivalent to the amount of total oxidized carbon. CVs collected before and after the AST to determine surface area changes from the double layer capacitance and changes in the density of surface oxide groups from the pseudocapacitance. The results showed that the presence of the hydrophobic –PhF 5 group protects the CIC-85 material from corrosion, while the hydrophilic –PhSO 3 H group also decreases the extent of CIC-85 oxidation, but by a lesser extent. A new model is suggested, wherein steric hindrance introduced by the functional groups, in addition to surface wettability alteration, prevents access of solution to the surface and protects carbon from oxidation. XPS analysis, before and after the corrosion experiments, showed that the surface functionalities are not lost after repeated exposure of the CIC-85 to the more aggressive anodic potentials. 1. D. Bélanger and J. Pinson, Chem. Soc. Rev. , 40 , 3995–4048 (2011). 2. X. Li et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces , 10 , 2130–2142 (2018). 3. F. Forouzandeh et al., J. Electrochem. Soc. , 165 , F3230–F3240 (2018). Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.946

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207