The Northern Terminus of Cascadia Subduction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Juan de Fuca (JDF) plate system is pivoting and breaking apart as a result of resistance to subduction. At the northern end, the Explorer (EXP) plate moves independently of the JDF plate along the Nootka Fault Zone (NFZ), which forms an unstable triple junction with the JDF ridge and the Sovanco Fracture Zone. We trace the subsurface extension of the NFZ using tomography by combining results from a new nearshore study with a previous ocean‐bottom study and other geophysical constraints. Cross sections from the offshore NFZ through central Vancouver Island suggest a strong fold in the subducting lithosphere (∼40°). Near the deformation front, the NFZ is defined by microseismicity that extends into oceanic mantle with low VP/VS (<1.7) values. This anomaly extends to the NE below the continental shelf with a more northerly trajectory than common NFZ depictions through the seismicity concentration off Nootka Island. Tremor locations and receiver functions indicate that this more northerly trajectory persists across Vancouver Island. We propose a revised tectonic evolution for the NFZ that leads to (i) an EXP microplate confined to shallow depths below the convergent margin and which underthrusts North America no farther landward than Brooks Peninsula and (ii) a northern edge of Cascadia subduction that cuts between Brooks Peninsula and Nootka Island. The plate fold offshore Nootka Island and abundant seismicity there and at Brooks Peninsula are ascribed to stress concentrations on either side of the NFZ associated with deformation at the edges of more competent JDF, EXP, and North American plates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".