Adolescencia y Comunicación
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Con el objetivo de proponer juegos de comunicación en estudiantes adolescentes, para optimizar el desarrollo de las actividades grupales en el proceso educativo, se realizó la siguiente investigación con enfoque eminentemente cualitativo en las carreras de Educación Básica y Educación Inicial de la Facultad de Ciencias Humanas y de la Educación. El estudio contó con la presencia de 3 docentes investigadores los cuales se involucraron en conocer los cambios que se producen en los adolescentes. Para ello se utilizaron los métodos, analítico sintético e inductivo deductivo, los cuales permitieron revisar la literatura existente para la descripción de los juegas, a su vez también se utilizó el análisis documental que permitió realizar un estudio de los juegos mas utilizados para la comunicación grupal. Se encuentran como resultados, tres juegos de comunicación, que serán aplicado durante todo el curso a los estudiantes de las carreras antes mencionadas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".