MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Adolescencia y Comunicación

2020· article· es· W3025520437 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueConcienciaDigital · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Innovations and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsCartographyArtGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Con el objetivo de proponer juegos de comunicación en estudiantes adolescentes, para optimizar el desarrollo de las actividades grupales en el proceso educativo, se realizó la siguiente investigación con enfoque eminentemente cualitativo en las carreras de Educación Básica y Educación Inicial de la Facultad de Ciencias Humanas y de la Educación. El estudio contó con la presencia de 3 docentes investigadores los cuales se involucraron en conocer los cambios que se producen en los adolescentes. Para ello se utilizaron los métodos, analítico sintético e inductivo deductivo, los cuales permitieron revisar la literatura existente para la descripción de los juegas, a su vez también se utilizó el análisis documental que permitió realizar un estudio de los juegos mas utilizados para la comunicación grupal. Se encuentran como resultados, tres juegos de comunicación, que serán aplicado durante todo el curso a los estudiantes de las carreras antes mencionadas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it