MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025551597

Emilio Grandío Seoane, A Balancing Act: British Intelligence in Spain During the Second World War Brighton, Portland, Toronto: Sussex Academic Press, 2017. 182 pp

2019· article· ca· W3025551597 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David A. Messenger

Bibliographic record

VenueRevistes Científiques de la University of Barcelona (University of Barcelona) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageca
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntelligence, Security, War Strategy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomic historyWorld War IIHistoryPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Emilio Grandío Seoane of the university of Santiago de Compostela has studied the Civil War and Second World War era in Galicia for numerous years, the fruits of which are here, in his first book published in English.Grandio places intelligence activity in Spain within the framework of broader British and Allied policy towards Spain since the Civil War, stressing how British anti-Communism, Spain's strategic supply of wolfram for war economies, and overall control of the Atlantic shipping lanes shaped British responses there, including on the intelligence front.The status of Gibraltar, too, was of particular concern for the British Government.The result is a study that nicely combines an assessment of overall British policy toward the Franco regime with the details of its effort through intelligence agencies to work with the regime of General Francisco Franco and forestall Nazi inroads into Spain.The British, first and foremost, always accepted Franco as the legitimate ruler of Spain, and the best option of many poor ones.Certainly a fear of the left, and of Communism especially, led Britain to want Franco to emerge from the Civil War as a stabilizing force.The immediate impact of this direction once the Second World War began, however, was an extensive and well developed espionage network in place for Nazi Germany and almost nothing in place on the part of the British.Thus when German trade in wolfram and other goods took off, German submarines were re-supplied in Spain, and Nazis established extensive spy stations along Spain's Atlantic coast to monitor Allied shipping, the British had to play catch up.This was the task given to Naval Attaché Alan Hillgarth, appointed in 1939 to organize the entirely of Britain's espionage work in Spain.Hillgarth used all the resources available to him to develop British intelligence in Spain, not only the Secret intelligence Service (SiS), but also those of the newly created Special operations Executive (SoE), designed to provoke and coordinate sabotage through active resistance to Nazi occupations on continental Europe.While outright sabotage was not permissible in a state that was either neutral or non-belligerent throughout the war, networks with Communist and other anti-Francoist resisters were developed by SoE agents in the chance that they could be mobilized if a German occupation or invasion of iberia occurred.As those chances lessened into 1942, the British largely abandoned further development of such contacts, a point reinforced by Ambassador Samuel Hoare

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevistes Científiques de la University of Barcelona (University of Barcelona)Same topicIntelligence, Security, War StrategyFrench-language works237,207