MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025610252 · doi:10.2110/jsr.2020.26

Lack of synsedimentary chemical alteration in polar carbonates (Ross Sea, Antarctica): Resolution of a conundrum

2020· article· en· W3025610252 on OpenAlexaff
Tracy D. Frank, Noël P. James, Aaron I. Shultis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sedimentary Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyAragoniteDiagenesisCarbonateBenthic zoneBioerosionGeochemistryPaleontologyOceanographyCalciteCoral

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Although rare in space and time, skeletal carbonates deposited on polar shelves hold great potential for improving understanding of the oceanography of the high latitudes. Low temperatures, low carbonate saturation states, and strong seasonality govern not only the nature of carbonate communities, but also how their deposits translate into the rock record. To understand the effects of early seafloor processes on preservation, we investigated late Quaternary carbonates recovered in piston cores from the Ross Sea, Antarctica. Sediments are unconsolidated skeletal gravels and sands that mantle areas of the outer shelf swept by strong bottom currents. Deposits are dominated locally by either stylasterine hydrocorals, barnacles, or bryozoans, which comprise assemblages with strong similarities to modern benthic communities. Radiocarbon ages indicate that carbonate factories were most prolific during the lead-up to the Last Glacial Maximum (Tartanian), when sediment input was minimized, and have been mostly dormant since. Results show that synsedimentary alteration is not substantially different in the temperate and polar realms with the significant exception of chemical diagenesis. As is common in temperate deposits, skeletal grains undergo disarticulation, fracturing, abrasion, and intense bioerosion. By contrast, cementation is absent and rare aragonite grains are preserved, indicating that taphonomic loss is not as prevalent as in temperate deposits. Primary skeletal microstructures and stable-isotope compositions are preserved, indicating that chemical alteration of grains is negligible. The preservation of aragonite in polar settings is herein attributed to low rates of organic-matter burial and very low temperatures, which strongly limit microbial activity. These factors allow interstitial waters to remain weakly supersaturated with respect to aragonite. Comparison with Permian analogs indicates that lithification is delayed until deposits reach burial depths at which chemical compaction proceeds. The ultimate end product is limestone with prominent compaction features and a tightly packed fabric. Calcitic skeletal material can retain primary geochemical compositions through the lithification process, although growth of burial cement in intraparticle porosity complicates selective sampling of unaltered material. In providing a cold-water end member for the spectrum of synsedimentary diagenetic processes, results highlight specific differences that should be accounted for when interpreting the deposits of polar, cold-water carbonate systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sedimentary ResearchSame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207