MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025631406 · doi:10.1063/5.0007779

Quantitative photothermal lock-in thermography imaging of curved surfaces of cylindrical solids

2020· article· en· W3025631406 on OpenAlexaff
Yu Liu, Ti Sun, Chinhua Wang, Andreas Mandelis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhotothermal therapyThermographyInfraredOpticsMaterials scienceThermal diffusivityPhotothermal spectroscopyThermalRadiationThermal radiationPhotothermal effectLaserField (mathematics)Surface (topology)PhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We extend the applications of photothermal radiometric diagnostics to continuously curved cylindrical surface solids using lock-in thermography (LIT) imaging, in which both the photothermally induced surface temperature and the angularly dependent infrared radiation emitted by the curved surface are not constant. Specifically, a theoretical photothermal model is established based on the Green Function method from which the thermal-wave field distribution at different azimuthal angles on the curved surface is obtained and characteristics of the thermal-wave field with different material and measurement parameters/schemes are discussed. A laser-infrared photothermal lock-in imaging system for solid cylindrical samples is established, and the thermal diffusivity of AISI 304 cylindrical steel samples is measured directly based on the LIT images combined with empirically obtained infrared radiation angular distributions over the curved surfaces. The experimental results are in excellent agreement with the theory, which provides a fast and non-destructive quantitative tool for thermophysical evaluation of curved surface solids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicThermography and Photoacoustic TechniquesFrench-language works237,207