MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025698963

The effect of transfixation pins on the biomechanical properties of angled acrylic connecting bars.

2019· article· en· W3025698963 on OpenAlexaff
Xavier Montasell, Gregory D Herndon, David Szwec, Guy Beauchamp

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone fractures and treatments
Canadian institutionsCegep de Saint Hyacinthe
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceStiffnessSlippagePreloadComposite materialAcrylic resinFixation (population genetics)ContouringStructural engineeringCompression (physics)Ultimate tensile strengthUltimate loadOrthodonticsEngineeringFinite element methodEngineering drawingMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

< 0.05) than those without pins at angulations of 45° and 60°. However, the columns with pins did not show significant differences in ultimate strength from the columns without pins at any of the angulations. The point of failure was always at the angle of the column, demonstrating that in axial compression the weakest point is not the pin-acrylic interface when pins are eccentrically located within the column.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicBone fractures and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207