MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025712677 · doi:10.1520/gtj20190150

Evaluation of Soil Coefficients for Two-Parameter Subgrade Soil Model Based on Rigid Plate Loading Tests

2020· article· en· W3025712677 on OpenAlexaff
Wang-Xi Zhang, Rui Liu, Hyeon‐Jong Hwang, Wei-Jian Yi

Bibliographic record

VenueGeotechnical Testing Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubgradeGeotechnical engineeringSoil gradationGeologyStructural engineeringEngineeringEnvironmental scienceWater content

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Two-parameter elastic foundation models have great potential for approximate soil-foundation-structure interaction analysis. A hurdle to the wide application of this model has been the difficulty of calibrating the two soil coefficients: the compression coefficient k and shear coefficient G. This paper presents a novel parameter calibration method for k and G based on a number of rigid plate loading tests. Empirical k and G values are also recommended. Experiments showed the validity of the proposed method. Two case studies verified the significance of the two-parameter model in the prediction of footing settlement when interactions among neighboring footings exist.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.718
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeotechnical Testing JournalSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207