Dix ans de communauté de pratique de veille en santé et services sociaux au Québec : réussites et défis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Encore peu développée il y a vingt ans, la veille connaît aujourd’hui au Québec un succès grandissant dans le secteur de la santé et des services sociaux. Au sein de la Communauté de pratique de veille en santé et services sociaux du Québec (CdPveille3S), des veilleurs passionnés, mus par un intérêt commun, partagent et coconstruisent les pratiques professionnelles de demain. Veille informationnelle, scientifique, stratégique, médiatique : autant d’activités qui répondent à des besoins spécifiques de ce domaine et nécessitent de solides compétences. L’article présente la CdPveille3S : son origine, sa mission, ses membres, ses principales réalisations, ses forces et ses défis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it