Analytical method of stability analyses of toppling rock slopes subjected to flexural toppling failure damage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mechanism of toppling deformation and failure is important in the stability analysis of anti-dip layered rock slopes, especially in a complex hydrogeological environment. In this paper, the flexural failure model is proposed for describing the mechanical behavior of toppling rock slope using the cantilever beam theory. A method for safety evaluation, considering the action of hydrodynamic force from groundwater, is developed. This model is then applied to conduct a case study of a toppling rock slope at a hydropower station on the Lancang River. The results show that the variation of reservoir water level increases both the tensile stresses and the deflections of rock slabs, which is manifested macroscopically by flexural displacements and failure. Based on the failure surfaces, the slope can be divided into three parts: toppling zone, creep zone, and shear zone. The failure mode of toppling rock slope is a combination of shear and toppling. Under the combined action of earthquake and rapid water drawdown, the toppling rock slope is at risk of shear instability at the leading edge; hence monitoring should be strengthened and prevention measures should be taken.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".