MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025781990 · doi:10.1109/vrw50115.2020.00024

Assessing Personality Traits of Team Athletes in Virtual Reality

2020· article· en· W3025781990 on OpenAlexaff
Markus Wirth, Stefan Gradl, Wolfgang Mehringer, Richard Kulpa, Hannes Rupprecht, Dino Poimann, Annemarie F. Laudanski, Bjoern M. Eskofier

Bibliographic record

Venue2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoachingApplied psychologyPersonalityPersonality psychologyVirtual realityBenchmark (surveying)Big Five personality traitsComputer scienceContext (archaeology)AthletesPsychologyHuman–computer interactionSocial psychologyPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Assessment of personality traits is highly relevant in team sports in order to analyze the performance of an athlete under pressure when in competitive situations, for team-strategic decisions, to optimize command transmission, and ultimately to understand top-level performers. It further facilitates the development and application of personalized exercises, coaching to improve performance in competition, and can be considered a valuable criterion for talent scouting and development. The current state of the art method to assess personality traits in sports relies on validated questionnaires. However, these often provide non-sport-specific, subjective self-reported information and lack the ability to measure how these characteristics are reflected in context-based performance.We developed a virtual reality (VR) tool for the assessment of personality traits in team sports, in our case for soccer. An evaluation of this tool within a study with 24 subjects yielded a benchmark of its immersion through user experience and provided an objective description of athletes’ personalities based on performance indicators extracted from activity-tracking. Within the tool, we implemented two realistic virtual soccer environments to assess the motivational orientation of soccer players (i.e. action- and state-orientation) which we discerned from the gold standard questionnaire.Results show that user experience and presence of the implemented virtual environments scored significantly higher compared to benchmark measurements. Additionally, a significant difference between the two groups of action and state-oriented athletes could be observed. Measures of failure rate, pass accuracy, number of perceived opponents, and achieved bonus goals are parameters that differ significantly among the two athlete groups. These findings show that VR technology is applicable for the assessment of athletes’ motivational orientation and thus demonstrate the feasibility of virtual environments as functional game scenario-based assessment tools for athletes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW)Same topicVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsFrench-language works237,207