MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025827417 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-01522868mtgabs

Influence of Pd Decoration on Carbon-Based Nanomaterials Towards Electrochemical Hydrogen Storage

2020· article· en· W3025827417 on OpenAlexaff
Emmanuel Boateng, Vincent Dim, Aicheng Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHydrogen Storage and Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrogen storageHydrogenNanomaterialsCarbon fibersMaterials scienceNanotechnologyEnergy storageHydrogen economyHydrogen fuelChemical engineeringChemistryEngineeringComposite numberComposite materialOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The growing need for deep decarbonisation of current global energy systems makes hydrogen-based economy an attractive option for the future. For the envisaged hydrogen economy to be commercially accessible, the challenge for hydrogen storage must be addressed. Solid-state hydrogen storage has received tremendous research interest due to its advantages, such as low cost, high efficiency, safety and high volumetric storage capacity [1,2]. In this study, different carbon-based materials were synthesized and characterized for hydrogen storage. The effect of the modification of those carbon-based materials with Pd nanoparticles was investigated. The significant enhancement of the hydrogen storage capacity is presented References: [1] L. Schlapbach, A. Züttel, Hydrogen-storage materials for mobile applications, Nature 414 (2001) 353–358. [2] E. Boateng, A. Chen, Recent advances in nanomaterials-based solid-state hydrogen storage, Mater. Today Adv. (2019) in press.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicHydrogen Storage and MaterialsFrench-language works237,207