MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025842761 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-011110mtgabs

A Rechargeable Zinc-Copper Battery Based on the Combination of a Monovalent Cationic Exchange Membrane and an Inert Charge Shuttle

2020· article· en· W3025842761 on OpenAlexaff
A. Keith Jameson, Ali Khazaeli, Dominik P. J. Barz

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced battery technologies research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrolyteZincInorganic chemistryCopperChemistryBattery (electricity)ElectrodeFlow batteryChlorideOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To reach their full potential, renewable and intermittent energy sources such as wind and sun need to be coupled with a cost effective energy management system that is able to convert, store, and delivery energy as required. The Daniell element is one of the earliest non-rechargeable batteries. It is based on abundant, cost-effective and environmentally-benign materials and the chemistry relies on reduction of copper at the positive electrode and oxidation of zinc at the negative electrode. Since both electrodes are immersed in different electrolytes, they have to be separated by a porous barrier or a salt-bridge in order to prevent the self-discharge of the battery. However, these separators are not selective and copper ions migrate over time to the negative electrode and deposit on the surface of the zinc electrode which reduces shelf time and makes recharging of the element impossible. In this work, we report on a novel Zinc-Copper battery design which is based on the application of a selective cation exchange membrane in conjunction with an unreactive sodium background electrolyte which acts as a charge shuttle. The membrane is impermeable for the copper (and zinc) ions but allows the sodium ions to migrate between the two half-cells to maintain the electro-neutrality. We first tested the suitability of different zinc-based electrolytes, including zinc sulfate, zinc chloride, and zinc nitrate. At equal electrolyte conductivities, we found a higher potential for the zinc deposition in sulfate electrolytes compared to that in chloride electrolytes. It was also observed that the zinc electrode passivated due to the formation of zinc oxide (ZnO) when operated in a zinc nitrate solution. In terms of the electrodeposition of copper, sulfate and nitrate-based electrolytes showed a nearly equal potential. However, chloride-based copper electrolytes shifted the potential to more negative values due to the stabilization of the monovalent copper ion intermediate. The membrane selectivity was evaluated by monitoring the crossover of copper ions into the zinc half-cell for various concentrations of copper in the copper half-cell. After seven days of open circuit operation, we measured copper concentrations below 10 ppm in the zinc half-cell when there was 0.1 M of copper sulfate in the copper half-cell. When the copper half-cell was filled with 0.5 M copper sulfate, the effect of crossover was evident by a blue tint of the electrolyte and the Zn electrode was covered with a layer of black/red deposit. Hence, we chose a conservative catholyte composition of 0.1 M copper sulfate and 1M sodium sulfate in the battery. We performed discharge measurements where we varied the discharge current density and measured the voltage over time. Discharge continued until a cell voltage of 0 V was reached, which corresponds to a complete consumption of the copper ions in the catholyte. Indeed, it turned out that we utilized only around 3 to 6 % of the zinc electrode and less than 1 % of the copper electrode during discharge. These very low values indicate that the present system could also be favorably-designed as a hybrid redox (flow) battery. Hence, for the current preliminary cell design it is seems reasonable to normalize the current with the mass of the initial copper ion content since it is the limiting electro-active species. At 0.5 mA/cm 2 (421 mA/g), the battery was discharged for around 17 hours before all of the copper ions were consumed resulting in a specific capacity of 763 mAh/g. The theoretical charge content based on the initial copper concentration was 843 mAh/g giving a faradaic yield of 90.5 %. The capacity and faradaic yield of the discharge at 1 mA/cm −2 (842 mA/g) were 583 mAh/g and 69.2 %, respectively. The recharge-ability of the battery was investigated over 100 charge-discharge cycles at a current density of ±0.5 mA/cm 2 . The average capacity was 530 mAh/g while the average exergy efficiency was 74 %. The deviations over the cycle numbers are less than 5 % of the average values. In other words, there was no clear increase or decrease during operation, indicating a steady performance. Afterwards, the zinc electrode was characterized using Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Only a very small amount of deposited copper was found, indicating a negligible copper ion cross over. This verifies that the combination of a cost-effective monovalent cation exchange membrane along with an unreactive background electrolyte imparts recharge-ability to the Daniell cell. Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.489

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvanced battery technologies researchFrench-language works237,207