Predisposition to Psychological Distress in Patients After Coronary Bypass Surgery: Relation to One Year Prognosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: to assess effect of type D personality (TDP) on one year prognosis after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Personality type was evaluated using the DS-14 scale in 683 patients before and in 1 year after CABG; 152 patients had TDP, 531 had not. After 1 year of follow-up we assessed functional class of angina and chronic heart failure, and registered cardiovascular complications (CVC): deaths, myocardial infarctions, strokes, amputations, thromboses of arteries of lower extremities, hospitalizations, requirements in repetitive angiographies of coronary grafts. Rate of development of combined end point comprising all these events was also evaluated. RESULTS: During follow-up CVC developed more often in patients with TDP compared with those without TDP (31.8 and 14.6%, respectively, =0.049). According to multifactorial regression analysis TDP was independently associated with 3.21 fold increase in risk of CVC. CONCLUSION: Detection of TDP after CABG is advisable for conducting subsequent interventions directed at improvement of long term results of treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".