MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3025964732 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-01381690mtgabs

Enhancing the Stability and Performance of Mo-Doped Titanium Suboxide Fuel Cell Catalyst Supports

2020· article· en· W3025964732 on OpenAlexaff
Reza Alipour Moghadam Esfahani, E. Bradley Easton

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceDopantCorrosionAnodeCarbon blackDopingElectrolyteCatalysisCatalyst supportDurabilityChemical engineeringNanotechnologyComposite materialElectrodeMetallurgyMetalChemistryOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) are a near-commercial clean energy technology with potential application in automotive and station power systems. However, the high cost of Pt catalyst and long-term durability of electrode materials still represents barriers towards that hinder market gains for the technology. The catalyst support material greatly influences electrocatalytic activity and durability of the catalytic Pt nanoparticles. Carbon black has been the primary catalyst support in fuel cells over the last 30 years due to its high surface area and electrical conductivity. However, carbon corrosion occurs readily during start-up/shutdown conditions. Therefore, more advanced support materials are need in order to overcome these problems. Metal oxides supports have improved corrosion resistance over carbon black supports, but they typically lack the required electrical conductivity for high performance. Titanium suboxides, specifically those doped with Mo (TOM) and other metals, have been shown to have acceptable electronic conductivity and strong affinity for Pt nanoparticles, to enhance their activity and stability in fuel cells. However, doping with only Mo still creates materials with a sizable band bandgap of 2.6 eV. Furthermore, the long term stability of the Mo dopant is a potential concern. Our group has taken a two-pronged approach to improving TOM materials. The first approach has been to add a second dopant. Specifically, we have a new material doped with both Mo and Si, Ti3O5-Mo-Si (hereafter referred to as TOMS) support. Remarkably, this support has a band gap of only 0.31 eV, approaching the conductivity of a metal. Furthermore, the TOMS material are highly durable and corrosion resistant, showing no signs of dopant loss under extremely corrosive conditions. Our second approach to improving TOM has been to convert it into a nanotube structure (TNTS-Mo) and from there covalently attach a monolayer of a nitrogen-rich terpyridine (tpy) ligand to the surface of the support (hereafter referred to as TPY/TNTS-Mo). The tpy ligand serves as a protective barrier that stabilizes the TNTS-Mo support. Furthermore, the nitrogen groups also have an electronic interaction with Pt catalyst nanoparticles that enhances their stability under harsh operating conditions. In this presentation, we will give an overview of support modification methods as well as detailed discussion of catalyst durability. Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting Abstracts→Same topicFuel Cells and Related Materials→French-language works237,207→