MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3026130262 · doi:10.4000/critiquedart.54281

Amanda Boetzkes, Plastic Capitalism: Contemporary Art and the Drive to Waste

2019· article· en· W3026130262 on OpenAlexaff
Déborah Laks

Bibliographic record

VenueCritique d’art · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsNuclear Waste Management Organization
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesCapitalismArtPhilosophyEthnologyPolitical scienceSociologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’écologie s’est aujourd’hui imposée dans la plupart des sphères de la vie publique et intellectuelle, à tel point qu’elle apparaît comme une des principales clés d’analyse du contemporain. Amanda Boetzkes s’en saisit dans un ouvrage qui cherche à comprendre la manière dont les artistes utilisent, comprennent et donnent à voir le déchet. Après son apparition sous sa forme contemporaine avec la révolution industrielle, le déchet est pendant longtemps relégué loin des villes et des consciences,...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.765
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritique d’artSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207