MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Two-Neutron Halo is Unveiled in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2020· article· lv· W3026132867 on OpenAlexafffund
S. Bagchi, R. Kanungo, Y. Tanaka, H. Geißel, P. Doornenbal, W. Horiuchi, G. Hagen, Toshio Suzuki, Naofumi Tsunoda, D. S. Ahn, H. Baba, J. K. Behr, F. Browne, S. Chen, M. L. Cortés, A. Estradé, N. Fukuda, M. Holl, K. Itahashi, N. Iwasa, G. R. Jansen, W. G. Jiang, S. Kaur, A. O. Macchiavelli, S. Y. Matsumoto, S. Momiyama, I. Murray, T. Nakamura, S. J. Novario, H. J. Ong, T. Otsuka, T. Papenbrock, S. Paschalis, A. Procházka, C. Scheidenberger, P. Schrock, Y. Shimizu, D. Steppenbeck, H. Sakuraï, D. Suzuki, Hiroaki Suzuki, M. Takechi, H. Takeda, Satoshi Takeuchi, R. Taniuchi, K. Wimmer, K. Yoshida

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2020
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityTRIUMFSaint Mary's University
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryOak Ridge National LaboratoryNuclear PhysicsRIKENNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceOffice of ScienceMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsHaloPhysicsRADIUSNeutronShell (structure)Nuclear physicsAtomic physicsAstrophysicsComputer scienceMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the measurement of reaction cross sections (σ_{R}^{ex}) of ^{27,29}F with a carbon target at RIKEN. The unexpectedly large σ_{R}^{ex} and derived matter radius identify ^{29}F as the heaviest two-neutron Borromean halo to date. The halo is attributed to neutrons occupying the 2p_{3/2} orbital, thereby vanishing the shell closure associated with the neutron number N=20. The results are explained by state-of-the-art shell model calculations. Coupled-cluster computations based on effective field theories of the strong nuclear force describe the matter radius of ^{27}F but are challenged for ^{29}F.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.187
Threshold uncertainty score0.625

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1870.048

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations93
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207