MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3026217043 · doi:10.1016/j.clp.2020.05.011

Intervention and Outcome for Neonatal Hypotension

2020· review· en· W3026217043 on OpenAlexaff
Keith J. Barrington, Afif El‐Khuffash, Eugene Dempsey

Bibliographic record

VenueClinics in Perinatology · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsMedicineIntraventricular hemorrhageObservational studyGestational ageOutcome (game theory)Randomized controlled trialIntervention (counseling)Adverse effectCausationPediatricsIntensive care medicinePregnancySurgeryInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many observational studies have shown that infants with blood pressures (BPs) that are in the lower range for their gestational age tend to have increased complications such as an increased rate of significant intraventricular hemorrhage and adverse long-term outcome. This relationship does not prove causation nor should it create an indication for treatment. However, many continue to intervene with medication for low BP on the assumption that an increase in BP will result in improved outcome. Only adequately powered prospective randomized controlled trials can answer the question of whether individual treatments of low BP are beneficial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.253
GPT teacher head0.550
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinics in PerinatologySame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207