Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trois types de mémoires du roman sont ici distingués : la mémoire profonde de l’enfance, la mémoire hystérique et la mémoire obsessionnelle. Chacune illustre un rapport particulier à l’oubli et au romanesque : comment conserver dans sa mémoire d’écrivain ce qui a été lu dans l’enfance ? Comment exercer une maîtrise de ce souvenir ? Comment évoquer ce qui a laissé une empreinte décisive sur la mémoire ? Pourquoi le devenir-mémoire du roman est-il dans l’écriture et l’invention romanesques ? Les textes autobiographiques (Perec, Sarraute, Duras, et d’autres), les scènes de lecture romanesque (Proust, Flaubert) et différents processus intertextuels (Simon, Perec) évoquent cette mémoire du roman qui se distingue si fortement de la mémoire poétique. Les prendre en considération, c’est tenter d’écrire la lecture, la mémoire et l’oubli.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it