MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3026299359 · doi:10.1101/2020.05.24.20112177

The effect of calcium and vitamin D on bone mineral density in patients taking glucocorticoid therapies: Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

2020· review· en· W3026299359 on OpenAlexaff
Jiawen Deng

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlucocorticoidVitamin D and neurologyOsteoporosisMedicineBone mineralFemoral neckCalciumMeta-analysisInternal medicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Glucocorticoid (GC) administration is an effective therapy commonly used in the treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. However, the use of GC can give rise to serious complications. The main detrimental side effect of GC therapy is significant bone loss, resulting in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP). We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate whether the use of calcium supplementation, with or without vitamin D, vitamin D metabolites and vitamin D analogues is capable of increasing bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and hip in adult patients undergoing glucocorticoid therapies compared to no treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.024
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.050
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.127

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0240.050
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0200.031
Bibliometrics0.0070.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicBone health and osteoporosis research→French-language works237,207→